Jira Review

Posted on Posted in Blog

Jira is a project management software solution from the developer Atlassian. Jira’s initial focus was for dealing with bug tracking pertaining to software development groups.

While still counting on its roots, it has evolved into a common tool for controlling projects, although it remains highly popular among companies involved with software and app development tasks.

Groups and organizations may use Jira to chart out a series of tasks required to complete a project. Jira has a variety of collaborative features which make team members more efficient.

Jira facilitates popular planning methodologies in Kanban plus Scrum. This gives Jira users the ability to customize the software interface to perfectly match the type of work they’re carrying out.

Compared to best project software, Jira compares favorably. As shown in our Jira review, we all believe Jira’s functions are particularly suited for those organizations that require to follow a geradlinig pattern to complete task management.

Jira is missing a few key functions, such as budget monitoring. Depending on the needs from the organization, other project management software packages works better. As with many of these types of software, there are no one-size-fits-all recommendation.

Think about the features you have to manage your group’ s specific varieties of projects. If Jira matches those features, it will serve you well. If Jira does not quite match the particular group’s needs, other packages exist which will work better.

Jira Pros and Cons


  • Customizable dashboards
  • Advanced security equipment
  • Strong user interface
  • Offers two planning methodology options
  • Strong administration tools
  • Good search efficiency
  • Fantastic for app advancement workflow
  • Works best with sequentially oriented projects
  • Outstanding document generating function
  • Frequent pop-up help windows with regard to newcomers


  • Often requires a lengthy studying curve
  • No live chat
  • Page hierarchy can become unwieldy
  • Relies too heavily upon plug-ins
  • Less flexibility compared to others

Visit Jira

Evaluate The Best Project Management Software
We reviewed dozens of project software tools and narrowed them down to the very best options.

See Top Picks

How Jira Compares to Best Project Management Software Solutions

Jira’s overall feature arranged and pricing divisions work extremely well to get projects involving software program and app advancement or projects that have a sequential pattern from beginning to finish. Jira excels in report generation and giving users the opportunity to select the interface that will matches the type of function the organization does.

On the other hand, Projects that need versatility and creativity to move forwards may be better offered with a software package besides Jira.

Our choices because the best product in the project management software class include:

  • Zoho Projects, which is an excellent all-around project management software package, delivering the best mix of features, powerful equipment, and integrations along with popular apps.
  • Wrike, which delivers versatility within managing projects and provides marketing organizations the flexibility they need to adjust the project scope, tasks, and timeline instantly.
  • Favro, which helps little organizations that need agility above all else in task management because team members often must execute a wide range of tasks.

Jira’s Project Complexity

Because Jira’s roots lie in software development, Jira works especially well for breaking down large projects into various smaller tasks. Jira gives organizations the ability to set up these tasks sequentially, moving the particular project from starting to end in a clear geradlinig fashion.

As difficulties arise along the way, Jira simplifies the process of establishing tickets to handle the problem before moving forward with all the remainder of the task.

Regarding projects where the duties don’t have a clear sequential movement, Jira may not be the best choice, though.

Intended for highly complex products that involve several steps and substeps to complete, LiquidPlanner is a better choice. It could handle a large number of contributors, meshing groups associated with a project that may need to work independently or even collaboratively.

For many huge organizations, LiquidPlanner has got the adaptability required to total complex projects, plus Jira can’t quite match it.

Jira’s Team Size

When fewer than ten people will be focusing on a project together, Jira’s Free tier has some strong features. Businesses may be able to use the Free version for small projects.

For larger groupings, Jira is able to level to meet their needs. It has a nice number of administrative tools, enabling the project manager to keep a close attention on the workload of each team member.

Jira’s Standard pricing rate works well for those groups that are growing, as the Premium tier provides a few more tracking features, giving administrators extra project administration tools versus the Standard tier.

Jira has sufficient flexibility in terms of the number of users it can effectively manage in a particular project that it even comes close favorably to the best software packages. Its Free of charge version is especially solid versus its colleagues for small projects.

Jira’s Ease of Use

Those new to Jira and new to project management software will find they have to spend some time learning how to use the software.

Newcomers could be up and running in a short amount of time, as Jira will a nice job of walking users with the basic setup procedure. To take full advantage of the software’s superior and strongest features, though, it will require a bit of ramp-up time.

Users will need to select the interface they want to use as part of the setup process, so it is beneficial to spend some time understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each interface.

Once the set up process is over, for all those people who have some understanding of other project management software packages, Jira is going to be relatively easy to use. The workflow management process is similar enough to other packages to give skilled users very few troubles.

For newcomers, Jira offers quite a few pop-up windows to provide assist for users because they move through the software. Experienced users can very clear these popup home windows immediately, while beginners to the software can read through the tips to obtain knowledge about various functions.

As with most project software packages, we’d recommend trying the Free rate of Jira or even trying a free test of the Standard or even Premium tier to gain a feel pertaining to how the software works. Using a hands-on test is the best way to see whether the interface is going to be easy to use for your corporation.

Jira’s Features

Prioritizing and booking tasks lie in the middle of Jira’s most powerful features. For those who need help with managing the particular project from start to finish in a linear manner and following a sequential path, Jira’s features are ideal.


In the early days of the project, Jira helps the particular project manager construct a timeline for that overall project, as well as the individual tasks required along the way. The supervisor can plan out the whole project, creating and assigning tasks.

Jira features a time tracking feature, so those associated with the project can see which aspects are taking longer than they should or whether certain tasks required less time than originally approximated, freeing up several team members to help in other areas.

Tracking Progress

Jira enables team members to follow the particular execution of each job along the way. However , the application is missing the checklist feature, which would be a benefit for any visual reminder from the steps remaining within the project.

The tracking functions in Jira permit project managers to clearly see which team members have some availability in their workloads to help in a different part of the project.

Report Generation

A pleasant shock within the Jira software is the ability to generate multiple kinds of reports. For individuals who can better imagine the progress on the project through a chart, Jira excels in this area.

Jira simplifies report era by providing a number of templates for reports. Users only have to select a template, and the software will certainly populate it with the relevant data.

For those groups that need strong real-time reporting features, but who need a project software package that offers a bit more flexibility than Jira, we like Wrike. It has excellent record generating features in a product that works nicely for marketing and innovative collaboration projects.

Comparing Functions

Jira’s feature list is certainly strong for the correct types of projects, but it is lacking in some important areas.

For example , Jira does not have the opportunity to track budgets and expenses related to the particular project. To manage the particular financial aspect of any kind of project, Jira users will need to make use of a various project management software package deal. As a competing item, LiquidPlanner has some strong features for tracking budgets and spending on projects.

The most feature-rich task management software, though, can be Zoho Projects. It provides a wide range of features which will equally handle complex and simple projects. It includes an extensive period tracking feature that allows the administrator to track time spent on the project, including designations for billable and non-billable hours invested.

Another feature-rich software package is usually Wrike. We appreciate how Wrike provides users the ability to add extra features for an extra cost, almost within an ala carte set up. Those who have basic requirements can stick with the bottom plan without incurring extra costs. This particular flexibility is helpful to get a wide range of organizations.

Jira’s Price

In past times, Jira used a few odd pricing divisions, offering a flat cost for a certain range of users, which managed to get quite a bargain compared to its peers in certain instances.

However , over the past few years, Jira has relocated to a commonly recognized per-user, per-month prices plan. Jira’s prices structure now is much more similar to the majority of the other best project management solutions.

Jira’s price tiers are competing with its peers, so those organizations that will like Jira’s functions and interface will receive a good value. Those organizations that need specific features Jira doesn’t offer won’t possess the temptation of purchasing Jira because it’s so much cheaper than rivals.

Pricing Tier Options

The available pricing tiers consist of:

  • Free: The Free of charge version has a restrict of 10 customers. For the end users, the features in the Free tier are quite similar to what’s found in the pay variations of the software, however the Free version does not have the administrative equipment found with the spend tiers.
  • Standard: The Standard edition costs $7 for each user per month for approximately 10, 000 customers. It delivers advanced administrative tools, such as specifying permissions, plus advanced security functions, including audit records. It provides professional customer care options during company hours, whereas just community support comes in the Free edition.
  • Premium: The Premium edition costs $14 per user per month for approximately 10, 000 users. Versus the Standard edition, Premium provides task archiving tools, day to day customer support, and administrative insights. Premium provides unlimited cloud storage for files, while the Standard version has a 250 GB storage limit.
  • Enterprise: The Business version works designed for companies with innovative security needs along with a global reach. It allows for connecting a large number of sites in order to Jira, where the High quality version only allows one site. Customers with the Enterprise version will receive a custom pricing option from Atlassian.

Jira provides a significant price lower price for non-profit institutions.

Jira also has an on-premises solution for those businesses who prefer this to the cloud solution. Organizations will need at least 500 users to utilize the on-premises solution.

Various other Packages to Consider on Price

For those with small teams that want a good pricing tier, we like Favro, with a number of features targeted at providing flexibility.

Meant for big teams that are looking for a more favorable cost than Jira provides, we would strongly consider TeamGantt. It has some nice price points regarding large groups.

Jira’s User interface

Jira’s interface has gone by way of a significant upgrade previously few years, so for individuals who may have tried Jira in the past and disliked it, it’s worth another look now.

One of the strongest aspects of Jira is the ability to choose among several web templates, allowing users to complement the interface in use with the template. Understanding exactly how each template works is important in order to the most out of the Jira software.

Jira provides explanations of each design template at the time users will be making a selection, that is helpful. But some customers will need to do a little extra homework to understand exactly what they’re selecting to help make the most of the software.

Jira’s’ options for selecting preparing methodologies include:

  • Kanban: The Kanban user interface in Jira allows team members to take on some of the various roles outlined for the project. Need to one team member need help with a task, others may jump in and help out as needed. Changes during the project may occur, as the Kanban interface provides versatility.
  • Scrum: The Scrum interface in Jira provides each of the team members a particular role. The owner will set up the goals and timelines, and the members of the team will work toward completing them. In the Scrum interface, adjustments to the timeline and to the project deliverables rarely happen.

Besides the desktop software, Jira has a mobile application, so users may remain in touch along with team members regarding the project at all times.

Two some other project management software packages with strong mobile apps are Zoho Projects and Favro. We also love the overall interface that both Zoho Tasks and Favro provide in their desktop versions.

Jira’s Collaboration

Jira’s collaborative functions focus less upon live, real-time cooperation and more on tracking discussions and messages that involve shifting toward the competition of the project.

Jira will not offer a live chat function, but it really does allow users in order to leave messages for every other. Users could make comments on different aspects of the project, recommending changes.

Through Jira’s file sharing and record storage functions, customers can keep the most important paperwork for the project in a single place, simplifying cooperation.

Although Jira includes a nice collection of functions in this area, Teamwork is really a stronger project management software package in terms of helping far-flung organizations and groups work on projects as if they’re functioning face to face. It includes a built-in chat feature that further enhances collaboration on all sorts of projects.

Visit Jira

Compare The Best Project Management Software
We reviewed a large number of project management software tools and narrowed them down to the best options.

See Top Picks


Although Jira works for nearly any kind of project management circumstance, its strengths then lie in projects that have a linear and sequential process. Software developers and app developers use Jira regularly and have for a long period, so it’s no surprise that Jira’s strengths closely align using these kinds of projects.

Those who have projects that don’t stick to linear pattern and who need quite a bit of flexibility in managing projects may want to look to Jira’s competitors, many of that have more of a concentrate on versatility.

Spread the love

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *